Privacy invasion
Concern during intimate-activity monitoring
Enabling Pose-Only IoT Cameras
for Privacy-Preserving Edge Vision
The University of Hong Kong
Video-based care can capture more than an activity.
Concern during intimate-activity monitoring
Concern during intimate-activity monitoring
Mean agreement, 1–6 scale (higher = stronger concern). Online survey, N=146. Maidhof et al., 2023 ↗
Faces · Expressions
Clothes · Personal care
Family · Private spaces
Less appearance exposure. Motion can still be sensitive.
On-device vision. Compact output. Useful activity sensing.
p95 pose latency
STM32H753 MCUOne skeleton record
12 joints · fixed-format SFSKPeak activation memory
Model activations only📷 Local RGB → 🦴 Skeleton stream → 🚶 Activity recognition
Local RGB frames
Compact pose model
Geometry, without RGB
Downstream activity recognition
Narrow early stages · Expand after downsampling
Visual features + Arm geometry → Refined joints
One empty-scene snapshot · Wake on motion
Two benchmarks. One real-world deployment.
Pose PCK@0.10
HAR Top-1 accuracy
±1.06% · three-seed meanPose PCK@0.10
HAR Top-1 accuracy
±0.12% · three-seed meanFP32 pose · HAR mean ± s.d., three seeds.
~40 minutes · One participant · Four activity states
Activity macro-F1
Mean absolute activity-duration error
Measured on the annotated session.
🏠 Fixed camera · One older adult
☀️ Three daytime monitoring sessions
state transitions / hour
state transitions / hour
state transitions / hour
From pose streams to daily activity patterns.
Explore the case study ↗Descriptive monitoring results; no dense ground-truth labels. Accuracy is evaluated in the separate annotated session above.
STM32H753 + OV2640 · On-device pose extraction
💤 Inactive → Low-power checks
🚶 Motion → Pose inference
Lower MCU-side current
during inactive periods
Enabling Pose-Only IoT Cameras
for Privacy-Preserving Edge Vision